Construction Company Cash Flow Solutions: Manage Project Debt
Construction Company Debt Relief: Key Financial Strategies
Specialized financial strategies for construction businesses dealing with project delays, material costs, and equipment financing challenges.
Construction's Unique Cash Flow Challenge#
Construction businesses face a cash flow challenge unlike any other industry. You often have to pay for materials and labor weeks or months before receiving payment from clients. Add in equipment costs, weather delays, and project scope changes, and it's easy to see why construction companies struggle with debt.
The average construction business carries $280,000 in debt, with many juggling equipment financing, material supplier debt, and emergency MCAs taken to cover cash flow gaps.
Common Construction Debt Issues#
Construction businesses typically face these specific debt challenges.
- Equipment financing for heavy machinery and vehicles
- Material supplier debt and vendor financing
- Project-based cash flow gaps
- Weather-related delays causing payment problems
- Subcontractor payment obligations
- Bonding and insurance costs
- Emergency MCAs to cover payroll during slow periods
Construction-Specific Relief Strategies#
Construction businesses need specialized approaches that account for project-based revenue and seasonal fluctuations.
Project-based payment restructuring aligns debt payments with project completion and payment schedules. Equipment refinancing reduces monthly obligations on heavy machinery. Supplier negotiation maintains critical relationships while reducing debt. MCA settlement eliminates high-cost emergency financing. Bonding capacity preservation ensures you can still bid on projects.
Case Study: Texas Commercial Contractor#
A Texas commercial contractor came to us with $420,000 in debt including equipment financing of $180,000, two MCAs totaling $140,000, and supplier debt of $100,000. Project delays had created a cash flow crisis.
We restructured equipment financing to reduce payments by 35%, settled both MCAs for $51,000 total, and negotiated extended payment terms with key suppliers. The contractor maintained bonding capacity and is now completing projects profitably.