Credit Cardholders’ Bill of Rights Revisited by Senate
Monday, March 30th, 2009
Lawmakers are attempting to resurrect the Credit Cardholders’ Bill of Rights legislation that died in the Senate last year in an attempt to provide relief for indebted credit card holders, reports Inside ARM (“Credit Cardholders’ Bill of Rights Gets New Life in Congress,” March 25, 2009).
Introduced by Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., and Sen. Richard J. Durbin, D-Ill., H.R. 627 would protect consumers from credit card companies’ predatory lending practices by limiting their exorbitant interest rate increases.
“The standard credit card agreement gives the lender the power to bleed their customer through evolving and ever more crafty tricks and traps,” Sen. Whitehouse said in a Senate hearing last week (“Debating a Ceiling On Credit Card Fees,” The Washington Post, March 25, 2009). “Under this business model, the lender focuses on squeezing out as much revenue as possible in penalty rates and fees, pushing the customer closer and closer to the edge of bankruptcy.”
The proposed legislation would apply to those companies that raise card rates higher than 15 percent plus the current yield of a 30-year treasury bond, which is currently set at 18.5 percent.
Federal Reserve regulations set to go into effect in 2010 that will target predatory lending practices by credit card issuers would be expanded under the new Credit Cardholders’ Bill of Rights:
- Prevent credit card companies from arbitrarily increasing interest rates on existing card balances
- End the practice of “double cycle” billing that currently allows creditors to charge interest on debt that consumers have already paid on time
- Prohibit lenders from advertising “fixed” rates unless the rates aren’t subject to change, or unless the fixed-rate period is clearly disclosed to the consumer
- Forbid lenders from applying cardholder payments to higher interest rate debts last
- Force creditors to accept payments made the following business day when the bills’ due date is a Sunday or a holiday
- Require creditors to offer more reasonable cut-off times for on-time mailed payments
While banking industry advocates admit that some card issuers have engaged in harmful practices , they say the industry as a whole has not overstepped its bounds and that cardholders issuers could be hurt rather than helped by the new legislation.
If the bill passes, “the market response would simply be to restrict credit, raise interest rates and fees or both,” said Kenneth Clayton, senior vice president and general counsel of the American Bankers Association’s Card Policy Council, in a letter to the Senate subcommittee. “This would significantly hurt tens of millions of Americans at the very time they can least afford it.”
Popularity: 5% [?]