<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Debt Relief Blog &#187; debt management plans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/tag/debt-management-plans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 15:25:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Felon-Run Debt Collector Shut Down for Bullying Consumers</title>
		<link>http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/money-news/felon-run-debt-collector-shut-down-for-bullying-consumers/</link>
		<comments>http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/money-news/felon-run-debt-collector-shut-down-for-bullying-consumers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 23:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lhillery</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Cuomo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buffalo debt collection agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buffalo debt colletors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt collection agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt collection companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt collections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt collectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt management plans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt management programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt reduction programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt relief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt settlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Final Claims Asset Locators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Attorney General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thug motivation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tobias Boyland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/?p=1243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After being accused by New York Attorney General, Andrew Cuomo, of using illegal scare tactics to “terrify” indebted Americans into repaying their debt, a Buffalo, N.Y., debt collection agency run by convicted felons has been shut down by state authorities.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After being accused by New York Attorney General, Andrew Cuomo, of using illegal scare tactics to “terrify” indebted Americans into repaying their debt, a Buffalo, N.Y., debt collection agency run by convicted felons has been shut down by state authorities<span id="more-1243"></span>, <em>The Los Angeles Times</em> reports (“<a title="LA Times: NY Authorities Shut Down Collection Agency Run By Convicted Felons" href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/wire/sns-ap-us-abusive-debt-collectors,1,3248422.story" target="_blank">After TV Report, NY Authorities Shut Down Collection Company Run By Convicted Felons</a>,” June 23, 2009).</p>
<p>“This company was run by people who lied, bullied, and preyed on vulnerable Americans struggling to resolve their financial situation,” Cuomo said. “Pretending to be a police officer, threatening to throw consumers in jail — these practices are despicable as they are illegal.”</p>
<p>Operating under the name Final Claims Asset Locators, among several other names, the debt collection agency had its collectors pose as law enforcement officials who told debtors they were being arrested.</p>
<p>In a recorded conversation, a debt collector even told a debtor, “Make sure you have somewhere for your kids to go. Lock up your house. Get some clean clothes, because you’re not coming home anytime soon.”</p>
<p>The debt collection agency was owned by a former drug dealer and convicted felon Tobias Boyland, who also went by the name “Bags of Money” and who served 13 years for armed robbery. Boyland was arrested this week on a weapons charge after authorities found him carrying a loaded, unlicensed pistol and after finding an AK-47 rifle and $34,000 in cash in his house.</p>
<p>Boyland also owns a modeling agency, has released a rap album, has written a self-help book called “Thug Motivation,” and has advertised his business on a billboard using an image of himself in a gladiator outfit.</p>
<p>Find information on <a href="http://www.thinkdebtrelief.com">debt relief</a> and other debt management options at ThinkDebtRelief.com</p>
<p>. </p>
<img src="http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=1243&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/money-news/felon-run-debt-collector-shut-down-for-bullying-consumers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Workers Take a Hit From Employers’ Scaled-Back 401(k) Plans</title>
		<link>http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/money-news/workers-take-a-hit-from-employers-scaled-back-401k-plans/</link>
		<comments>http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/money-news/workers-take-a-hit-from-employers-scaled-back-401k-plans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 23:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lhillery</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[401k benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[401k contributions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[401k features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[401k incentives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[401k investment contributions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[401k plans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[401k programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[401k savings plans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[401k strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[401k trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Schwab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt consolidation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt management plans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt management programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt relief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt settlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement plans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement programs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/?p=1239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A quarter of U.S. employers aren’t able to keep up with the expense of matching employees’ 401(k) contributions, according to the results of a new Charles Schwab survey.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A quarter of U.S. employers aren’t able to keep up with the expense of matching employees’ 401(k) contributions, according to the results of a new Charles Schwab survey<span id="more-1239"></span> (“<a title="Reuters: Employers Cutting Back 401(k) Plans, Study Shows" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE55L0AZ20090622" target="_blank">Employers Cutting Back 401(k) Plans, Study Shows</a>,” Reuters, June 22, 2009).</p>
<p>401(k) plans allow workers to defer taxes on part of their income and invest that money in stock and bond mutual funds. Large companies like the ones surveyed by Charles Schwab, ranging in revenues from $100 million to more than $10 million, often match employees’ 401(k) investment contributions.</p>
<p>The constricted economy, however, has forced 23 percent of companies to stop offering 401(k) match opportunities, although many of the companies say this move will be temporary.</p>
<p>“They don’t see that as a long-term approach,” said Steve Anderson, head of Retirement Plan Services at Charles Schwab.</p>
<p>Workers with 401(k) plans, whose savings have taken a huge hit recently, typically pay close attention to their company’s matching program. In fact, 87 percent of employees polled identified 401(k) match as the most important feature of their company’s 401(k) plan. The second most important feature was access to advice on 401(k) investing.</p>
<p>The online survey also found that a quarter of companies are no longer offering open enrollment for 401(k) savings plans, limiting enrollment to certain employees.</p>
<p>Find information on <a href="http://www.thinkdebtrelief.com">debt relief</a> and other debt management options at ThinkDebtRelief.com</p>
<p>. </p>
<img src="http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=1239&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/money-news/workers-take-a-hit-from-employers-scaled-back-401k-plans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>International Monetary Fund Predicts Gradual Economic Recovery</title>
		<link>http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/money-news/international-monetary-fund-predicts-gradual-economic-recovery/</link>
		<comments>http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/money-news/international-monetary-fund-predicts-gradual-economic-recovery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lhillery</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bailout plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt management plans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt management program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt reduction plans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt reduction programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt relief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt settlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt settlement plans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt settlement programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic outlook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial rescue programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gross domestic product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IMF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international monetary fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus package]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[treasury bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world economic outlook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/?p=1234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The International Monetary Fund has forecasted that the U.S. economy will contract 2.5&#160;percent before the end of this year but will expand 0.75&#160;percent by the end of 2010, according to analysis of the IMF’s World Economic Outlook report from April.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The International Monetary Fund has forecasted that the U.S. economy will contract 2.5 percent before the end of this year but will expand 0.75 percent by the end of 2010, according to analysis of the IMF’s World Economic Outlook report from April<span id="more-1234"></span> (“<a title="Bloomberg: IMF Raises Forecast for U.S. Economy, Risk of Debt" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=aZyz4j1GVHKM" target="_blank">IMF Raises Forecast for U.S. Economy, Risk of Debt</a>,” Bloomberg, June 15, 2009).</p>
<p>The Federal Reserve, the Obama administration, and Congress were all commended by IMF, the Washington-based lender that has helped rescue the economies of Pakistan and Iceland, for their efforts to salvage the economy with a “well-targeted” stimulus package.</p>
<p>In fact, the report showed that the stimulus package will raise the gross domestic product, the value of goods and services produced in the United States, by 1 percent this year and by 0.25 percent in 2010, pointing to the likelihood of a “gradual” recovery.</p>
<p>Despite the IMF predicting a solid upturn in the economy in the next year, it still sees the U.S. unemployment rate topping 10 percent next year and sees a successful exit plan from the financial rescue programs as essential to the country’s recovery.</p>
<p>“The combination of financial strains and ongoing adjustments in the housing and labor markets is expected to restrain growth for some time, with a solid recovery projected to emerge only in mid-2010,” the staff review of the IMF report stated.</p>
<p>The IMF projects that public debt will nearly double from 2009 to 2011 to 75 percent of the gross domestic product, putting significant pressure on the Treasury bond rates, which are currently low, making it easier for prospective homebuyers to get low mortgage rates.</p>
<p>Find information on <a href="http://www.thinkdebtrelief.com">debt relief</a> and other debt management options at ThinkDebtRelief.com</p>
<p>. </p>
<img src="http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=1234&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/money-news/international-monetary-fund-predicts-gradual-economic-recovery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court to Rule on Bankruptcy Reform Law</title>
		<link>http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/money-news/supreme-court-to-rule-on-bankruptcy-reform-law/</link>
		<comments>http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/money-news/supreme-court-to-rule-on-bankruptcy-reform-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 19:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lhillery</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt management plans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt management programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt relief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt relief advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt relief agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt relief lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt settlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first amendment court cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside ARM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pre bankruptcy planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reuters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme court cases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/?p=1228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court will take on a provision of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 that restricts “debt relief agencies,” including lawyers, from advising their clients to take on additional debt before filing for bankruptcy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court has agreed to take on a case that addresses the constitutionality of a provision in the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 that restricts “debt relief agencies,” including lawyers, from advising their clients to take on additional debt before filing for bankruptcy<span id="more-1228"></span>, <em>InsideARM</em> reports (“<a title="InsideARM: Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Challenge to Bankruptcy Reform Law Provision" href="http://www.insidearm.com/index.cfm?objectID=C55D8FFC-C7A9-2F25-E6D14F8E075A1178&amp;print=1" target="_blank">Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Challenge to Bankruptcy Reform Law Provision</a>,” June 9, 2009).</p>
<p>The section of the U.S. bankruptcy code in question was ruled to be in violation of the First Amendment by the U.S. appeals court in St. Louis in 2007 because the law “prevented lawyers from fulfilling their duty to clients to give them appropriate and beneficial financial advice.”</p>
<p>The court ruled that the law was passed as an attempt by Congress to stem lawyers’ abuse of the bankruptcy system but that language was too broad.</p>
<p>In fact, the court said, some clients might even benefit from their lawyers’ freedom to advise taking on certain types of debt, including a mortgage refinance, which can free up funds to help a consumer pay off other debt before filing for bankruptcy.</p>
<p>The language “would include advice constituting prudent pre-bankruptcy planning that is not an attempt to circumvent, abuse, or undermine the bankruptcy laws,” the court wrote (“<a title="Reuters: U.S. Top Court to Decide Bankruptcy Advice Case" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUSN0832275120090608" target="_blank">U.S. Top Court to Decide Bankruptcy Advice Case</a>,” Reuters, June 8, 2009).</p>
<p>In the Supreme Court case, which will be heard in October, the Obama administration is expected to argue that this provision of the Act can be viewed narrowly enough to allow debt relief agencies to advise their clients in anyway they see fit.</p>
<p>Find information on <a href="http://www.thinkdebtrelief.com">debt relief</a> and other debt management options at ThinkDebtRelief.com</p>
<p>. </p>
<img src="http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=1228&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/money-news/supreme-court-to-rule-on-bankruptcy-reform-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Missouri Attorney General Sues Texas Debt Relief Company</title>
		<link>http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/money-news/missouri-attorney-general-sues-texas-debt-relief-company/</link>
		<comments>http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/money-news/missouri-attorney-general-sues-texas-debt-relief-company/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 20:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lhillery</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Koster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit card debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit card debt relief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit card help]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Solutions of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt management plans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt management programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt reduction plans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt reduction programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt relief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt relief cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt relief fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt relief lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt relief scandals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt relief schemes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt relief services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt settlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt settlement lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri attorney general]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/?p=1222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Missouri Attorney General Chris Koster has filed suit against debt relief company Credit Solutions of America for illegally charging consumers for debt relief services the company never provided.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Missouri Attorney General Chris Koster has taken legal action against a Texas debt settlement company, filing a lawsuit against Credit Solutions of America for illegally charging consumers for debt relief services the company never provided<span id="more-1222"></span>, his office announced in a press release last week (“<a title="Missouri Attorney General Office: Koster Files Suit to Stop Company for Falsely Promising Credit-Card Debt Help" href="http://ago.mo.gov/newsreleases/2009/AG_Koster_Suit_Against_Credit_Solutions/" target="_blank">Attorney General Koster Files Suit to Stop Company for Falsely Promising Credit-Card Debt Help</a>,” June 2, 2009).</p>
<p>Credit Solutions of America, based in Richardson, Texas, advertised that it could cut consumers’ credit card payments in half, reduce their other monthly bills, and get them out of debt within three years, Koster says. But although the company collected hefty fees from consumers with the promise of delivering those debt reduction results, Koster charges that Credit Solutions of America never provided the advertised debt relief services, leaving its customers in a worse financial situation than before.</p>
<p>According to the Attorney General, Credit Solutions of America charged its customers fees that amounted to about 15 percent of their total debt, collecting those fees through an initial upfront payment and then through subsequent installment payments that it took directly from customers’ bank accounts.</p>
<p>The state of Missouri prohibits companies from collecting fees for credit services prior to the services being performed in full. Moreover, says Koster, the company wasn’t even legally registered to do business in the state.</p>
<p>“Credit Solutions of America promised real relief to consumers who were in financial straits because of high credit card debt,” Koster said. “We will continue to aggressively pursue the unacceptable business practices of these companies that offer false promises and deliver only harm.”</p>
<p>Get debt relief information from a trustworthy <a href="http://www.thinkdebtrelief.com">debt relief company</a></p>
<p>. </p>
<img src="http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=1222&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/money-news/missouri-attorney-general-sues-texas-debt-relief-company/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Companies Favor Salary Freezes to Avoid Layoffs</title>
		<link>http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/money-news/companies-favor-salary-freezes-to-avoid-layoffs/</link>
		<comments>http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/money-news/companies-favor-salary-freezes-to-avoid-layoffs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 23:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ekuhl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baltimore Business Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Challenger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer credit counseling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost cutting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost cutting measures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost reductions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit counseling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cutting costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt consolidation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt management plans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt relief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt settlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diane Stafford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee salaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[furloughs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gray & Christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job cutting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Challenger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[layoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rehire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retrain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salary cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salary freeze]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[temporary layoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tuition reimbursement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weakened economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wesley DeBerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work hours]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/?p=1202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since January, employers have been more likely to scale back employee salaries than to eliminate positions, a recent survey reveals. This shift away from job-cutting could be a sign that the nation’s 8.9&#160;percent unemployment rate&#160;— the highest in 25 years&#160;— may be starting to level out.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since January, employers have been more likely to scale back employee salaries than to eliminate positions, a recent survey reveals.<span id="more-1202"></span></p>
<p>This shift away from job-cutting could be a sign that the nation’s 8.9 percent unemployment rate — the highest in 25 years — may be starting to level out, reports the <em>Baltimore Business Journal</em> (“<a title="Baltimore Business Journal: Survey: More Employers Trimming, Freezing Salaries" href="http://www.bizjournals.com/baltimore/stories/2009/06/01/daily8.html" target="_blank">Survey: More Employers Trimming, Freezing Salaries</a>,” June 1, 2009).</p>
<p>The percentage of employers that have cut or frozen employee salaries has nearly doubled since the first month of 2009, from 27 to 52 percent, according to the most recent employer survey conducted by outplacement consultancy firm Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas.</p>
<p>Largely in response to a weakened economy, 86 percent of the companies surveyed in May said they reduced costs by freezing or cutting salaries, which represents a small decline from the 92 percent of companies who indicated in January that they’d implemented similar cost-cutting measures.</p>
<p>To cut costs, employers have also shortened employee work hours, imposed furloughs, eliminated tuition reimbursement programs, and made temporary layoffs.</p>
<p>John Challenger, CEO of Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas, suggests that temporary layoffs are a better cost-cutting solution for employers in the long-run than permanently eliminating positions.</p>
<p>“It is a lot easier to restore compensation and benefits,” he said, “than it is to rehire and retrain workers when the economy improves.”</p>
<img src="http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=1202&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/money-news/companies-favor-salary-freezes-to-avoid-layoffs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2 Arkansas Women Dodge Credit Repair Fraud Allegations</title>
		<link>http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/money-news/2-arkansas-women-dodge-credit-repair-fraud-allegations/</link>
		<comments>http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/money-news/2-arkansas-women-dodge-credit-repair-fraud-allegations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 23:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lhillery</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkansas attorney general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkansas county]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkansas Democrat Gazette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer credit counseling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit counseling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Counseling Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit record]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit repair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit repair scam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt consolidation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt management plans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt relief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt settlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dustin McDaniel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Services Unlimited]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fresh Start Credit Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Service Unlimited Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sherrye Mance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tiffany Morris]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/?p=1192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two Arkansas women who have been sued for defrauding at least 139 people in a credit-repair scam have refused to respond to a judge’s order to pay $700,000 in penalties and have even started a new credit repair operation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two Arkansas women who have been sued for defrauding at least 139 people in a credit-repair scam have refused to respond to a judge’s order to pay $700,000 in penalties and have even started a new credit repair operation, the <em>Arkansas Democrat Gazette</em> reports (“<a title="Arkansas Democrat Gazette: State Wins Credit-Repair Fraud Case" href="http://www.nwanews.com/adg/News/260537/" target="_blank">State Wins Credit-Repair Fraud Case</a>,” May 26, 2009).</p>
<p>For four years, Sherrye Mance and Tiffany Morris allegedly defrauded customers seeking the credit repair services of three of their companies. The women, who operated the three unincorporated businesses Financial Services Unlimited, Service Unlimited Inc., and Credit Counseling Service, have reportedly started running a new credit repair operation under the name “Fresh Start Credit Service.”</p>
<p>In a lawsuit, the Arkansas attorney general has accused Mance and Morris — who collectively owe their victims $127,565 — of charging customers for “services purported to improve a customer’s credit history, credit record, and credit ratings,” although these services were likely never “actually performed.”</p>
<p>Mance and Morris have, so far, refused to respond to the lawsuit, missed their court hearing, and failed to respond to a court injunction. Meanwhile, the Arkansas attorney general’s office has already started receiving complaints from California residents about the defendants’ new company.</p>
<p>Arkansas Attorney General Dustin McDaniel believes the two women still live nearby — Mance in a neighboring Arkansas county and Morris in Mississippi. McDaniel says he is exploring all legal options that would force the women to pay the penalty fees and repay the 139 affected customers.</p>
<img src="http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=1192&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/money-news/2-arkansas-women-dodge-credit-repair-fraud-allegations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 Ways to Save Money</title>
		<link>http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/managing-money/10-ways-to-save-money/</link>
		<comments>http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/managing-money/10-ways-to-save-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 23:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lhillery</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Managing Your Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2insure4less]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[car maintanence tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phone savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparison shopping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coupon shopping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt management plans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt management programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt relief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt settlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debtreduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[esurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Citizen Information Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free checking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grocery coupons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grocery savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grocery shopping tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet coupon sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[load management programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail order pharmacies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money saving advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money saving tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[off hour rate programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid checking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal finance tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal finances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone bill savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prescriptions savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[repair services savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surviving the economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ways to save money]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/?p=1173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this economy, everyone’s looking for another way to scrimp here and cut back there. You’d be surprised at how much extra money you can keep in your account just by doing an audit of all your monthly expenses and making a few simple adjustments. Here are 10 tips to help you start saving more today. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this economy, everyone’s looking for another way to scrimp here and cut back there. When every penny counts, you want to make sure you’re saving as much as you can on basic household items and life’s bare necessities.</p>
<p>You’d be surprised at how much extra money you can keep in your account just by doing an audit of all your monthly expenses and making a few simple adjustments. Here are 10 tips to help you start saving more today in all areas of your life.</p>
<h3>1.	Ditch the paid checking.</h3>
<p>Look for a bank that offers free checking with no minimum balance. You could save as much as $100 a year in fees if you’re currently paying for your checking account.</p>
<h3>2.	Don’t leave for the grocery store without coupons and a shopping list.</h3>
<p>Avoid impulse shopping. Sticking to a list of must-haves and going in armed with coupons for the items on your list could cut your grocery bill in half. Check weekly newspaper ads, and sign up for alerts on Internet coupon sites to get notified of upcoming deals. Pay close attention to the price-per-ounce (or other unit) when comparison shopping: A similarly priced item may actually be much more expensive than you think because it’s smaller and you’re getting less for your money.</p>
<h3>3.	Resist the convenience of the convenience store.</h3>
<p>It’s easy to pick up a gallon of milk, a loaf of bread, or that roll of paper towels you need when you stop to fill up at the gas station, but you’re paying for the convenience of that one-stop shopping: These stores often charge some of the highest prices for food and groceries. Avoid paying 50-percent markups. Find time to make your shopping runs, and get your groceries at the grocery store.</p>
<h3>4.	Audit your electricity use.</h3>
<p>Ask your electric or gas company to check out your utility usage, or do it yourself. Depending on when your usage is heaviest, signing up for an off-hour rate program or a load management program could help you save hundreds of dollars a year on your electric bills.</p>
<h3>5.	Pore over your phone bills.</h3>
<p>Take a fine-tooth comb to your cell and home phone bills to see if you’re paying for minutes and services you don’t need. Make adjustments so you can take advantage of plans that give you the best rate for times when you tend to use the most minutes. Consider getting rid of your landline altogether: Most cell phone providers offer monthly packages with lots of minutes and free roaming and long distance for less than what you’re paying to maintain both a cell phone and a landline.</p>
<h3>6.	Keep your car in shape.</h3>
<p>A regular engine tune-up and something as simple as making sure your tires are properly inflated can help you save around $100 a year on gas.</p>
<h3>7.	Insist on fixed bids for repair services.</h3>
<p>Only hire people and companies for home repairs who offer fixed-price bids for work. Home repair servicers often draw complaints, many times for trying to charge more than they initially quoted once they’re midway through the repairs.</p>
<h3>8.	Cut back on car insurance coverage.</h3>
<p>To save money on your monthly premiums, unless you’re on the road a lot, consider raising the deductible on your collision and comprehensive coverage to at least $500 or, if you have an older car, getting rid of collision completely.</p>
<h3>9.	Get new homeowner’s and renter’s insurance quotes.</h3>
<p>Call around or get quotes online from sites like <a title="Esurance" href="http://www.esurance.com/Welcome/Home/HomePage.aspx" target="_blank">Esurance</a> and <a title="2Insure5Less" href="http://www.2insure4less.com/" target="_blank">2Insure4Less.com</a>. You could find a lower rate with a new provider or use competitors’ lower quotes to negotiate a better rate with your current insurer. Check your state insurance department to make sure you aren’t paying more for insurance than typical rates in your area.</p>
<h3>10.	Shop around for the best prices on your prescriptions.</h3>
<p>You may end up having to get different medications at different locations, but the savings can be huge. Consider trying mail-order pharmacies, and, if possible, always opt for generic versions of your prescriptions.</p>
<p>For even more money-saving ideas, check out the Federal Citizen Information Center’s 66 Ways to Save Money.</p>
<img src="http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=1173&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/managing-money/10-ways-to-save-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>$500,000 Award Against Collections Company One of the Largest Yet</title>
		<link>http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/money-news/500000-award-against-collections-company-largest-yet/</link>
		<comments>http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/money-news/500000-award-against-collections-company-largest-yet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 18:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ekuhl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abusive collections tactics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cease and desist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charge card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collection agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collection award]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer credit counseling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credigy Services Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit card balance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit counseling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Humphreys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt collections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt collectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt consolidation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt management plans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt relief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt settlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demand to pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Debt Collection Practices Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[false claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDCPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[InsideARM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luz Fausto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manny Newburger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manuel Fausto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[punitive damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wells Fargo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/?p=1125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In one of the largest collection awards ever granted by a jury, a California couple has been awarded $500,000 in damages for being harassed and threatened by the debt collection agency Credigy Services Corporation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In one of the largest collection awards ever granted by a jury, a California couple has been awarded $500,000 in damages for being harassed and threatened by the debt collection agency Credigy Services Corporation, reports <em>insideARM</em> (“<a title="insideARM: Jury Awards $500,000 to California Couple in FDCPA Case" href="http://www.insidearm.com/go/arm-news/jury-awards-500000-to-california-couple-in-fdcpa-case" target="_blank">Jury Awards $500,000 to California Couple in FDCPA Case</a>,” May 5, 2009).</p>
<p>Under the <a title="Fair Debt Collection Practices Act" href="http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/consumer/credit/cre27.pdf" target="_blank">Fair Debt Collection Practices Act</a>, which protects consumers against abusive collections tactics by debt collectors, Manuel and Luz Fausto were awarded $100,000 for actual damages and $400,000 in punitive damages, granted by a jury for “malicious and reckless disregard of the couple’s rights.”</p>
<p>The award stems from a dispute over the couple’s Wells Fargo charge card debt they thought they had paid off in the late 1990s, said the Faustos’ lawyer, David Humphreys of Humphreys Wallace Humphreys, P.C.</p>
<p>During the mid-1990s, the couple realized that their credit card balance was continuing to rise even though they were making payments on their account, but a local Wells Fargo branch denied their request to have the account frozen.</p>
<p>To resolve the situation, the Faustos went to a local debt settlement company that promised to negotiate a payoff of the credit card balance. The couple thought the account had been paid off in the late 1990s, after they made two money order payments.</p>
<p>Then in 2006, the couple was contacted by Credigy with a demand to pay $17,000. Even after a cease-and-desist notice was sent to a Brazilian affiliate of Credigy, the debt collection company still made over 90 threatening calls and sent innumerable letters to the Faustos’ home.</p>
<p>Debt collection attorney Manny Newburger says the jury award in this case is one of the largest given to a consumer under the FDCPA, noting that usually “there is little or no evidence of actual damages presented by the consumer.” In this particular case, however, the Faustos were able to document the harassing nature of Credigy’s practices, including the company’s baseless threats, having recorded the last phone call from the collector.</p>
<p>Newburger believes that the verdict in the Fausto case was based largely on state legislation and doesn’t think that the size of the award will motivate more consumers to sue debt collection agencies in the future.</p>
<p>“I think this verdict is indicative of what this jury thought of this particular case,” Newburger said, “but not of anything else.”</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><em><strong>Correction: May 8, 2009</strong> </p>
<p>This post has been revised to reflect the following correction: The original post mistakenly referred to the $500,000 jury verdict as the largest award conferred upon a consumer under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. In fact, the $500,000 decision is </em>among<em> the largest FDCPA findings on behalf of a consumer, but not the singular largest.</em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<img src="http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=1125&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/money-news/500000-award-against-collections-company-largest-yet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mortgage ‘Cramdown’ Measure Defeated in Senate</title>
		<link>http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/uncategorized/mortgage-%e2%80%98cramdown%e2%80%99-measure-defeated-in-senate/</link>
		<comments>http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/uncategorized/mortgage-%e2%80%98cramdown%e2%80%99-measure-defeated-in-senate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 22:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lhillery</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy options]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cramdown legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt management plans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt management program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt relief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt settlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreclosure rescue program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home loan interest rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hope for Homeowners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House housing bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house housing legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortage interest rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage modification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama housing plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate housing bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate housing legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Dick Durbin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/?p=1120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With a vote of 45 to 51, Senate Republicans defeated a measure that would have allowed bankruptcy judges to modify mortgage terms for bankruptcy filers, dealing a blow to the Obama administration’s foreclosure rescue program, which has yet to make a noticeable dent in the number of families losing their homes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With a vote of 45 to 51, Senate Republicans defeated a measure that would have allowed bankruptcy judges to modify mortgage terms for bankruptcy filers, dealing a blow to the Obama administration’s foreclosure rescue program, which has yet to make a noticeable dent in the number of families losing their homes, <em>The Washington Post</em> reports (“<a title="Washington Post: Senate Defeats Measure to Allow Bankruptcy Judges to Change Mortgage Terms" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/30/AR2009043000286.html" target="_blank">Senate Defeats Measure to Allow Bankruptcy Judges to Change Mortgage Terms</a>,” April 30, 2009).</p>
<p>The defeated measure would have allowed bankruptcy court judges to modify the mortgage terms of a bankruptcy filer’s primary residence with the possibility of having the filer’s interest rate or principal balance lowered in a process known as a “cramdown.” Currently bankruptcy judges can only modify mortgages for second homes or investment properties.</p>
<p>While opponents of the bill, including the nation’s biggest banks and Republicans in the Senate, argue that the bankruptcy modification provision would increase lending costs for future homebuyers and, therefore, destabilize the housing market even further, supporters of the cramdown measure contend that it would help more than 1.7 million struggling homeowners to stay in their homes.</p>
<p>In spite of the defeat, the measure’s sponsor, Senator Dick Durbin, D–Ill., is determined to keep pushing for cramdown legislation that he says is needed. In the time since he’s been campaigning for bankruptcy code reform, Durbin says home foreclosures have jumped from 2 million to 8 million.</p>
<p>“I’ll be back. I’m not going to quit on this,” Durbin said. “At some point, the Senators in this chamber will decide the bankers shouldn’t write the agenda for the United States Senate.”</p>
<p>The measure is part of a larger Senate housing bill that includes a provision to revamp the <a title="Department of Housing and Urban Development: Hope For Homeowners" href="http://www.hud.gov/hopeforhomeowners/" target="_blank">Hope for Homeowners</a> program and a proposal to temporarily increase the deposits guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and which still has to be reconciled with the House’s version of the bill. House Democrats will most likely remove the cramdown measure from the bill to help get it passed by both houses of Congress.</p>
<img src="http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=1120&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thinkdebtrelief.com/debt-relief-blog/uncategorized/mortgage-%e2%80%98cramdown%e2%80%99-measure-defeated-in-senate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

