Colorado Attorney General John Suthers announced Monday that his office had filed a consumer protection lawsuit against a Westminster-based debt settlement company for allegedly engaging in fraudulent debt management practices.

According to the lawsuit, Prestige Financial Solutions and its principal, Amy Thompson, failed to comply with a series of disclosure requirements mandated by the Colorado Uniform Debt Management Services Act (DMSA). The alleged violations of state debt relief law included failing to inform consumers of their right to cancel contracts without penalty and failing to provide consumers with refunds upon cancellation. The debt settlement company also was allegedly operating without a debt relief license, which is unlawful in Colorado (“Attorney General Announces Consumer Protection Lawsuit Against Westminster-Based Debt Settlement Company,” Office of the Attorney General of Colorado press release, Jan. 9, 2012).

“In these difficult economic times, some Colorado consumers have turned to debt management providers for help,” the lawsuit said. “Debt management providers encourage consumers to default on their debts and then promise to assist the consumers by settling the consumers’ debts for pennies on the dollar. But after paying thousands of dollars to a debt settlement provider, consumers often discover that the provider has done nothing — or very little — to improve the consumers’ financial situation” (“Colo. AG Sues Debt Settlement Company,” Legal Newsline, Jan. 9, 2012).

The lawsuit seeks to suspend or revoke Prestige Financial Solutions’ debt relief license in Colorado and issue a permanent injunction barring the defendants from providing debt management services to Colorado residents in violation of the DMSA. The lawsuit also seeks civil penalties, restitution for alleged victims, and court expenses and attorneys fees.

Further Reading

Notice of Duty to Answer: State of Colorado v. Prestige Financial Solutions, Inc. Filed Jan. 6, 2012.

Popularity: 1% [?]

A lawsuit filed by the Pennsylvania Attorney General’s Office against an Erie-based debt collection firm that used deceptive, intimidating tactics against consumers, including operating a fake courtroom, has been amended to hold the company’s owners personally liable for violations of consumer protection laws.

Deputy Attorney General Leslie Grey filed the amended complaint in Erie County Court Thursday against Unicredit America Inc. president Michael J. Covatto. Covatto’s half-brother, vice president Anthony D. Covatto, was added to the complaint in June. Attempts to also add Covatto to the complaint in June failed because he had filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy protection just days earlier. But in November, chief U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge Thomas Agresti ruled that Covatto’s personal bankruptcy didn’t insulate him from the Attorney General’s Bureau of Consumer Protection (“AG Files New Lawsuit Against Erie’s Unicredit,” Eire Times-News, Jan. 9, 2012).

In October, 2010, the state filed a lawsuit against Unicredit for alleged deceptive practices the company used to confuse and coerce consumers, including using employees dressed resembling sheriff deputies to hand-deliver phony “hearing notices” that threatened consumers with imprisonment if they failed to show up for bogus court “hearings” or “depositions” that were held in a fake courtroom built at the company’s offices. The fake courtroom was quickly closed and the business shuttered a month later.

Covatto has been appointed an assistant federal public defender, though no criminal charges have been filed against him. Covatto has repeatedly invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. Covatto’s bankruptcy lawyer has requested that Agresti dismiss the Attorney General’s claim. Agresti will hear argument on the request in federal court on March 5.

Although the Attorney General’s claim seeks fines and court costs, Agresti said the office couldn’t enforce any money judgment against Covatto without his approval.

Popularity: 1% [?]

Fraudulent mortgage debt relief schemes that falsely promise to help troubled homeowners get mortgage modifications through the federal government ranked as one of the top scams of 2011 by the Better Business Bureau (BBB).

The consumer information organization released it’s top 10 scams of 2011 on Wednesday, detailing the top scams from nine categories including identity theft, sales, check cashing, home improvement, and job offers. Mortgage modification scams ranked as the top financial scam of the year. In a tenth category, the BBB’s infamous Scam of the Year award went to a phishing scam in which millions of consumers got fake emails that looked like official notifications from the BBB (“BBB Names Top Ten Scams of 2011,” BBB press release, Jan. 4, 2011).

In schemes related to deceptive mortgage modification services, websites were often set up on the Internet that purportedly had a connection with the federal government’s U.S. Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP), which was set up by the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) to help homeowners facing foreclosure alter the terms of their mortgages, including things like lowering monthly payments or principal balances, so they can stay in their homes. However, the scammers had no connection or insider access to HAMP and were simply charging exorbitant fees for a service that HAMP provided for free.

“In challenging economic times, many people are looking for help getting out of debt or hanging on to their home, and almost as many scammers appear to take advantage of desperate situations,” the BBB said in a statement. “Because the federal government announced or expanded several mortgage relief programs this year, all kinds of sound-alike websites have popped up to try to fool consumers into parting with their money. Some sound like a government agency, or even part of BBB or other nonprofit consumer organization. Most ask for an upfront fee to help you deal with your mortgage company or the government (services you could easily do yourself for free), and almost all leave you in more debt than when you started.”

A total of $29.9 billion in TARP funds has been set aside for foreclosure prevention programs such as HAMP. Through the first 11 months of 2011, 756,407 homeowners nationwide received default notices on their home mortgages and 742,649 homes were repossessed. Various state and federal officials around the country brought actions against mortgage debt relief scammers in 2011. SIGTARP, the federal agency responsible for monitoring fraud in TARP, for example, shut down 125 alleged mortgage debt relief schemes in November that had advertised on the popular search engines Yahoo, Bing, and Google. The investigations as led to criminal charges against 17 people, including three sentenced to prison (“Foreclosure Crisis Spurs Epidemic of Mortgage Modification Scams,” Detroit Free Press, Jan. 4, 2011).

Popularity: 1% [?]

With a vote of 45 to 51, Senate Republicans defeated a measure that would have allowed bankruptcy judges to modify mortgage terms for bankruptcy filers, dealing a blow to the Obama administration’s foreclosure rescue program, which has yet to make a noticeable dent in the number of families losing their homes, The Washington Post reports (“Senate Defeats Measure to Allow Bankruptcy Judges to Change Mortgage Terms,” April 30, 2009).

The defeated measure would have allowed bankruptcy court judges to modify the mortgage terms of a bankruptcy filer’s primary residence with the possibility of having the filer’s interest rate or principal balance lowered in a process known as a “cramdown.” Currently bankruptcy judges can only modify mortgages for second homes or investment properties.

While opponents of the bill, including the nation’s biggest banks and Republicans in the Senate, argue that the bankruptcy modification provision would increase lending costs for future homebuyers and, therefore, destabilize the housing market even further, supporters of the cramdown measure contend that it would help more than 1.7 million struggling homeowners to stay in their homes.

In spite of the defeat, the measure’s sponsor, Senator Dick Durbin, D–Ill., is determined to keep pushing for cramdown legislation that he says is needed. In the time since he’s been campaigning for bankruptcy code reform, Durbin says home foreclosures have jumped from 2 million to 8 million.

“I’ll be back. I’m not going to quit on this,” Durbin said. “At some point, the Senators in this chamber will decide the bankers shouldn’t write the agenda for the United States Senate.”

The measure is part of a larger Senate housing bill that includes a provision to revamp the Hope for Homeowners program and a proposal to temporarily increase the deposits guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and which still has to be reconciled with the House’s version of the bill. House Democrats will most likely remove the cramdown measure from the bill to help get it passed by both houses of Congress.

Popularity: 4% [?]

Americans may want to mark Feb. 14 on their calendars for a reason besides Valentine’s Day; it’s the last day consumers will be able to access their FICO credit scores on myFICO.com with Experian credit data included, The New York Times reports (more…)

Popularity: 8% [?]

You may’ve seen the headlines. Unsuspecting tenants who are responsibly paying their rent on time are among a growing number of foreclosure victims – as many as 40 percent of renters in single-family housing are being evicted from foreclosed rental properties after their cash-strapped landlords stop paying the mortgage, reports the National Low Income Housing Coalition in Washington, D.C. (more…)

Popularity: 3% [?]

This holiday season some well-meaning friends may have missed the mark on a few of the gift cards they gave you: cards to a store you’d never step a foot in, to a store that’s not in your area, or to a coffee shop when you prefer to get your daily dose of caffeine from a soda. (more…)

Popularity: 6% [?]

Interest rates on 30-year fixed-rate mortgages have fallen to their lowest level in more than four years, averaging 5.33 percent, according to financial publishing company HSH Associates. (more…)

Popularity: 4% [?]